SEARCH SITE
VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL
- Code of Virginia
- Virginia Administrative Code
- Constitution of Virginia
- Charters
- Authorities
- Compacts
- Uncodified Acts
- RIS Users (account required)
SEARCHABLE DATABASES
- Bills & Resolutions
session legislation - Bill Summaries
session summaries - Reports to the General Assembly
House and Senate documents - Legislative Liaisons
State agency contacts
ACROSS SESSIONS
- Subject Index: Since 1995
- Bills & Resolutions: Since 1994
- Summaries: Since 1994
Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.
1996 SESSION
961730376Patrons-- Grayson, Abbitt, Barlow, Connally, Deeds, Jones, J.C., Murphy, Plum, Van Yahres and Woodrum; Senators: Maxwell, Miller, Y.B. and Ticer
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That §§ 9-6.14:4, 9-6.14:16, 10.1-1318, and 62.1-44.29 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted and that the Code of Virginia is amended by adding a section numbered 9-6.14:7.2 as follows:
§ 9-6.14:4. Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
A. "Agency" means any authority, instrumentality,
officer, board or other unit of the state government empowered by the basic
laws to make regulations or decide cases.
B. "Agency action" means either an agency's regulation or
case decision or both, any violation, compliance, or noncompliance with which
could be a basis for the imposition of injunctive orders, penal or civil
sanctions of any kind, or the grant or denial of relief or of a license, right,
or benefit by any agency or court.
C. "Basic law" or "basic laws" means provisions of the Constitution
and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia authorizing an agency to make
regulations or decide cases or containing procedural requirements therefor.
D. "Case" or "case decision" means any agency proceeding or
determination that, under laws or regulations at the time, a named party as a
matter of past or present fact, or of threatened or contemplated private
action, either is, is not, or may or may not be (i) in violation of such law or
regulation or (ii) in compliance with any existing requirement for obtaining or
retaining a license or other right or benefit.
"Guidance document" means any official record, as that term is defined in § 2.1-341, which an agency uses as direction, instruction or advice in applying regulations or making determinations regarding regulated activities that include, but are not limited to, permitting activities, issuance of certificates or granting of other authorizations.
E. "Hearing" means agency processes other than those informational
or factual inquiries of an informal nature provided in §§ 9-6.14:7.1
and 9-6.14:11 of this chapter and includes only (i) opportunity for private
parties to submit factual proofs in formal proceedings as provided in §
9-6.14:8 of this chapter in connection with the making of regulations or (ii) a
similar right of private parties or requirement of public agencies as provided
in § 9-6.14:12 hereof in connection with case decisions.
F. "Rule" or "regulation" means any statement of general
application, having the force of law, affecting the rights or conduct of any
person, promulgated by an agency in accordance with the authority conferred on
it by applicable basic laws.
G. "Subordinate" means (i) one or more but less than a quorum of the
members of a board constituting an agency, (ii) one or more of its staff
members or employees, or (iii) any other person or persons designated by the
agency to act in its behalf.
H. [Repealed.]
§ 9-6.14:7.2. Use of supplemental information by agency.
A. When an agency uses supplemental information in applying their regulations, the supplemental information shall be known as a "guidance document."
B. Use of guidance documents shall not replace the function of regulations. If a guidance document is anticipated to be or is routinely used for at least a year before being substantially changed, the agency is charged with promulgating the guidance document as a regulation.
C. Notice of the use of a guidance document by an agency shall be published by the agency in at least three consecutive issues of the Virginia Register of Regulations, before implementing its use. Notice of substantial changes to the guidance document shall be published in the same manner. The agency shall accept and consider public comment on the guidance document for at least forty-five days, either concurrent with the public notice period or subsequent to it.
D. If the agency receives public comment which it chooses not to incorporate in the guidance document, it shall send a letter of explanation and justification to all citizens who submitted comments on the guidance document. A copy of the explanation and justification shall be kept as part of the record of the regulation.
§ 9-6.14:16. Right, forms, venue.
A. Any person affected by and claiming the unlawfulness of any regulation, or
party aggrieved by and claiming unlawfulness of a case decision, as the same
are defined in § 9-6.14:4 of this chapter and whether or not excluded from
the procedural requirements of Article 2 (§ 9-6.14:7.1 et seq.) or 3
(§ 9-6.14:11 et seq.) hereof, shall have a right to the direct review
thereof by an appropriate and timely court action against the agency as such or
its officers or agents in the manner provided by the
rulesRules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. Any
person claiming the unlawful use of a guidance document shall have a right to
direct review thereof by an appropriate and timely court action against the
agency as such or agents in the manner provided by the Rules of the Supreme
Court. In the case of environmental-permitting decisions
made under the authority of §§ 10.1-1318, 10.1-1457, or
62.1-44.29, "aggrieved" shall be interpreted consistent
with the provisions of Article III of the U.S.
Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the
United States, as being that (i) the person must have suffered an injury in
fact, that is, an invasion of a legally protected
interest which is concrete and particularized, and actual
or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical;
(ii) there must be a casual connection between the injury and the conduct
complained of, that is, the injury has to be
fairly traceable to the challenged action of the
defendant, and not the result of the independent action
of some third party not before the court; and (iii) it must be
likely, as opposed to merely
speculative, that the injury will be redressed
by a favorable decision. Such actions may be instituted in any court of
competent jurisdiction as provided in § 9-6.14:5, and the judgments of
such courts of original jurisdiction shall be subject to appeal to or review by
higher courts as in other cases unless otherwise provided by law. In addition,
when any such regulation or case decision is the subject of an enforcement
action in court, the same shall also be reviewable by the court as a defense to
the action, and the judgment or decree therein shall be appealable as in other
cases.
B. The provisions of this article shall apply to case decisions regarding the grant or denial of aid to dependent children, Medicaid, food stamps, general relief, auxiliary grants, or state-local hospitalization. However, no appeal pursuant to this article may be brought regarding the adequacy of standards of need and payment levels for public assistance programs. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 9-6.14:17, such review shall be based solely upon the agency record, and the court shall be limited to ascertaining whether there was evidence in the agency record to support the case decision of the agency acting as the trier of fact. If the court finds in favor of the party complaining of agency action, the court shall remand the case to the agency for further proceedings. The validity of any statute, regulation, standard or policy, federal or state, upon which the action of the agency was based shall not be subject to review by the court. No intermediate relief shall be granted under § 9-6.14:18.
§ 10.1-1318. Appeal from decision of Board.
A. Any owner aggrieved by a final decision of the Board under § 10.1-1309, § 10.1-1322 or subsection D of § 10.1-1307 is entitled to judicial review thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act (§ 9-6.14:1 et seq.).
B. Any person who is aggrieved by a final decision of the Board under §
10.1-1322, who participated, in person or by submittal of
written comments, in the public comment process related to the Board's decision
and who has exhausted all available administrative remedies for review of
the Board's decision, shall be entitled to judicial review of the Board's
decision in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act
(§ 9-6.14:1 et seq.). The person invoking jurisdiction under this
subsection bears the burden of establishing that (i) such person has suffered
an actual, threatened or imminent injury; (ii) such injury is an invasion of an
immediate, legally protected, pecuniary and substantial interest which is
concrete and particularized; (iii) such injury is fairly traceable to the
decision of the Board and not the result of the action of some third party not
before the court; and (iv) such injury will likely be redressed by a favorable
decision by the court. For purposes of this section,
"aggrieved" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in
§ 9-6.14:16.
§ 62.1-44.29. Judicial review.
(1) Any owner person aggrieved by a final
decision of the Board under §§ 62.1-44.15 (5), 62.1-44.15 (8a), (8b),
and (8c), 62.1-44.16, 62.1-44.17, 62.1-44.19 or § 62.1-44.25, whether such
decision is affirmative or negative in form, is entitled to judicial review
thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Process Act
(§ 9-6.14:1 et seq.). For purposes of this section,
"aggrieved" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in
§ 9-6.14:16.
(2) through (8) [Repealed.]