SEARCH SITE

VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL

SEARCHABLE DATABASES

ACROSS SESSIONS

Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.

2019 SESSION

  • print version
(HB2686)

GOVERNOR'S VETO

 

    Pursuant to Article V, Section 6, of the Constitution of Virginia, I veto House Bill 2686. This bill reduces the number of votes required for a local Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) to approve a variance or reverse a zoning determination made by a locality. The practical result of House Bill 2686 would be to make it easier to circumvent the zoning authority of local governments.

     

    The Code of Virginia authorizes any locality to enact a zoning ordinance to regulate the use of land, buildings, structures, and other premises under the locality’s jurisdiction for the general purpose of promoting the health, safety, or general welfare of the public. The General Assembly requires any locality that enacts a zoning ordinance to establish a BZA to hear and decide appeals of zoning decisions.

     

    Under current law, a majority vote of the membership of the BZA is required to reverse a decision or determination, or to approve a variance. This legislation would make it easier for the BZA to overturn a decision of the professional local zoning administrator by lowering the required vote from a majority of the full BZA membership to a majority of those present and voting. Zoning appeals issues are involved and complex and there should be a higher threshold to reverse the decisions and determinations made by a locality.

     

    In my recommended amendment to House Bill 2686, I proposed a compromise that would have allowed a locality to reduce, by ordinance, the number of votes required for a BZA to approve a variance or reverse a zoning determination. The General Assembly rejected the compromise amendment.

     

    Accordingly, I veto House Bill 2686.

     

GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATION

 

    1.     Line 2, enrolled, Title, after reenact

      strike

      insert

        §

 

    2.     Line 7, enrolled, after That

      strike

      insert

        §

 

    3.     Line 7, enrolled, after Virginia

      strike

        are

      insert

        is

 

    4.     Line 8, enrolled

      strike

        all of lines 8 through 59

 

    5.     Line 64, enrolled, after from.

      strike

        The

      insert

        By ordinance, a locality may provide that the concurring vote of a majority of the membership of the board present and voting shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative officer or to decide in favor of the applicant on any matter upon which it is required to pass under the ordinance or to effect any variance from the ordinance. Unless otherwise provided by local ordinance, the

 

    6.     Line 65, enrolled, after board

      strike

        present and voting