SEARCH SITE
VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL
- Code of Virginia
- Virginia Administrative Code
- Constitution of Virginia
- Charters
- Authorities
- Compacts
- Uncodified Acts
- RIS Users (account required)
SEARCHABLE DATABASES
- Bills & Resolutions
session legislation - Bill Summaries
session summaries - Reports to the General Assembly
House and Senate documents - Legislative Liaisons
State agency contacts
ACROSS SESSIONS
- Subject Index: Since 1995
- Bills & Resolutions: Since 1994
- Summaries: Since 1994
Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.
1995 SESSION
LD1575828Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That §§ 38.2-3407 and 38.2-4209 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted as follows:
§ 38.2-3407. Health benefit programs.
A. One or more insurers may offer or administer a health benefit
program under which the insurer or insurers may offer preferred
provider policies or contracts that limit the numbers and types of providers
of health care services eligible for payment as preferred providers.
B. Any such insurer shall establish terms and conditions that shall be met
by a hospital, physician or type of provider listed in § 38.2-3408 in order
to qualify for payment as a preferred provider under the policies or
contracts. These terms and conditions shall not discriminate unreasonably
against or among such health care providers. No hospital, physician or type
of provider listed in § 38.2-3408 willing to meet the terms and conditions
offered to it or him shall be excluded. Insurers shall make such terms
and conditions available to the public upon written request. Insurers shall
not be required to disclose terms and conditions which contain confidential
or proprietary information. Neither differences in prices
fees among hospitals or other institutional providers
produced by a process of individual negotiations with providers or based on
market conditions, or price fee differences among
providers in different geographical areas, shall be deemed unreasonable
discrimination. The Commission shall have no jurisdiction to adjudicate
controversies growing out of this subsection.
C. For the purposes of this section, “preferred provider networks” include hospitals, physicians or types of providers listed in § 38.2-3408 with whom an insurer contracts to provide health care or mental health care services through a preferred provider health benefit program. Any such insurer which offers a health benefit program as provided in subsection A shall establish and use preferred provider networks in accordance with the following requirements:
1. Notice of the development of each preferred provider network shall be published in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation for each area in which the preferred provider network will operate so as to provide reasonable notice to the maximum number of providers that reasonably can be anticipated to submit applications for inclusion in the network. In addition, insurers shall provide a preferred provider application and the relevant terms and conditions to a provider upon request.
2. All preferred provider applications or proposals submitted in accordance with the format and procedure prescribed by the insurer shall be given reasonable consideration. All preferred provider applications shall be reviewed according to the insurer’s terms and conditions established pursuant to subsection B.
3. Providers who submit a complete preferred provider application shall be notified, in writing, of the insurer’s decision regarding acceptance or denial. For providers not accepted into the preferred provider network, such notice shall include the reason or reasons for the insurer’s decision.
4. An internal review process shall be established whereby, upon written request, a provider who is not accepted into the preferred provider network may request a review of his application. Such request for review shall be made by a provider within thirty days of receipt of the insurer’s decision. The review shall be conducted on behalf of the insurer by individuals (i) who did not participate in making the decision being reviewed, and (ii) who are at higher management levels than the individuals who rendered such decision. The Insurers shall respond in writing to the provider within thirty days of receipt of a provider’s written request for review, advising the provider of the results thereof.
D. The Commission shall have no jurisdiction to adjudicate controversies growing out of subsections B and C.
CE. Mandated types of providers set forth in §
38.2-3408, and types of providers whose services are required to be made
available and that have been specifically contracted for by the holder of any
such policy or contract shall, to the extent required by § 38.2-3408, have
the same opportunity to qualify for payment as a preferred provider as do
doctors of medicine.
DF. Preferred provider policies or contracts shall
provide for payment for services rendered by nonpreferred providers, but the
payments need not be the same as for preferred providers.
EG. For the purposes of this section, "preferred
provider policies or contracts" are insurance policies or contracts that
specify how services are to be covered when rendered by preferred and
nonpreferred classifications of providers.
§ 38.2-4209. Preferred provider subscription contracts.
A. As used in this section, a "preferred provider subscription contract" is a contract that specifies how services are to be covered when rendered by providers participating in a plan, by nonparticipating providers, and by preferred providers.
B. Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 38.2-4218 and 38.2-4221, any nonstock corporation may, as a feature of its plan, offer preferred provider subscription contracts pursuant to the requirements of this section that limit the numbers and types of providers of health care services eligible for payment as preferred providers.
C. Any such nonstock corporation shall establish terms and conditions that
shall be met by a hospital, physician or other type of provider listed in §
38.2-4221 in order to qualify for payment as a preferred provider under the
subscription contracts. These terms and conditions shall not discriminate
unreasonably against or among health care providers. No hospital, physician
or type of provider listed in § 38.2-4221 willing to meet the terms and
conditions offered to it or him shall be excluded. Nonstock
corporations shall make such terms and conditions available to the public
upon written request. Nonstock corporations are not required to disclose
terms and conditions which contain confidential or proprietary information.
Differences in prices fees among hospitals or
other institutional providers produced by a process of individual
negotiations with the providers or based on market conditions, or
price fee differences among providers in different
geographical areas shall not be deemed unreasonable discrimination. The
Commission shall have no jurisdiction to adjudicate controversies growing out
of this subsection.
D. For the purposes of this section, “preferred provider networks” include hospitals, physicians or types of providers listed in § 38.2-4221 with whom a nonstock corporation contracts to provide health care or mental health care services through a preferred provider subscription contract. Any such nonstock corporation which offers or administers a preferred provider subscription contract as provided in subsection B shall establish and use preferred provider networks in accordance with the following requirements:
1. Notice of the development of each preferred provider network shall be published in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation for each area in which the preferred provider network will operate so as to provide reasonable notice to the maximum number of providers that reasonably can be anticipated to submit applications for inclusion in the network. In addition, nonstock corporations shall provide a preferred provider application and the relevant terms and conditions to a provider upon request.
2. All preferred provider applications submitted in accordance with the format and procedure prescribed by the nonstock corporation shall be given reasonable consideration. All preferred provider applications shall be reviewed according to the nonstock corporation’s terms and conditions established pursuant to subsection C.
3. Providers who submit a complete preferred provider application shall be notified, in writing, of the nonstock corporation’s decision regarding acceptance or denial. For providers not accepted into the preferred provider network, such notice shall include the reason or reasons for the nonstock corporation’s decision.
4. An internal review process shall be established whereby, upon written request, a provider who is not accepted into the preferred provider network may request a review of his application. Such request for review shall be made by a provider within thirty days of receipt of the nonstock corporation’s decision. The review shall be conducted on behalf of the nonstock corporation by individuals (i) who did not participate in making the decision being reviewed, and (ii) who are at higher management levels than the individuals who rendered such decision. Nonstock corporations shall respond in writing to the provider within thirty days of receipt of a provider’s written request for review, advising the provider of the results thereof.
E. The Commission shall have no jurisdiction to adjudicate controversies growing out of subsections C and D.
DF. Mandated types of providers listed in § 38.2-4221
and types of providers whose services are required to be made available and
which have been specifically contracted for by the holder of any subscription
contract shall, to the extent required by § 38.2-4221, have the same
opportunity as do doctors of medicine to qualify for payment as preferred
providers.
EG. Preferred provider subscription contracts shall
provide for payment for services rendered by nonpreferred providers, but the
payments need not be the same as for preferred providers.