SEARCH SITE
VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL
- Code of Virginia
- Virginia Administrative Code
- Constitution of Virginia
- Charters
- Authorities
- Compacts
- Uncodified Acts
- RIS Users (account required)
SEARCHABLE DATABASES
- Bills & Resolutions
session legislation - Bill Summaries
session summaries - Reports to the General Assembly
House and Senate documents - Legislative Liaisons
State agency contacts
ACROSS SESSIONS
- Subject Index: Since 1995
- Bills & Resolutions: Since 1994
- Summaries: Since 1994
Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.
1998 SESSION
(HB961)GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Page 1, enrolled, line 17, after amount.
strike
when the court finds as a matter of law that the damages awarded by the jury are excessive, the trial court may (i) award a new trial or (ii) require a plaintiff to remit a part of his recovery, as ascertained by the verdict of a jury. If either the plaintiff or the defendant declines to accept such reduced award, the trial court shall award a new trial.
If, pursuant to this subsection, remittitur is accepted by either party under protest, it may be reviewed on appeal.
insert
in which the trial court shall require a plaintiff to remit a part of his recovery, as ascertained by the verdict of a jury, or else submit to a new trial, such plaintiff may remit and accept judgment of the court thereon for the reduced sum under protest, but, notwithstanding such remittitur and acceptance, if under protest, the judgment of the court in requiring him to remit may be reviewed by the Supreme Court upon an appeal awarded the plaintiff as in other actions at law; and in any such case in which an appeal is awarded the defendant, the judgment of the court in requiring such remittitur may be the subject of review by the Supreme Court, regardless of the amount.