SEARCH SITE

VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL

SEARCHABLE DATABASES

ACROSS SESSIONS

Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.

1998 SESSION

  • print version
(HB961)

GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATION

    1. Page 1, enrolled, line 17, after amount.

      strike

        when the court finds as a matter of law that the damages awarded by the jury are excessive, the trial court may (i) award a new trial or (ii) require a plaintiff to remit a part of his recovery, as ascertained by the verdict of a jury. If either the plaintiff or the defendant declines to accept such reduced award, the trial court shall award a new trial.

        If, pursuant to this subsection, remittitur is accepted by either party under protest, it may be reviewed on appeal.

      insert

        in which the trial court shall require a plaintiff to remit a part of his recovery, as ascertained by the verdict of a jury, or else submit to a new trial, such plaintiff may remit and accept judgment of the court thereon for the reduced sum under protest, but, notwithstanding such remittitur and acceptance, if under protest, the judgment of the court in requiring him to remit may be reviewed by the Supreme Court upon an appeal awarded the plaintiff as in other actions at law; and in any such case in which an appeal is awarded the defendant, the judgment of the court in requiring such remittitur may be the subject of review by the Supreme Court, regardless of the amount.