SEARCH SITE

VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL

SEARCHABLE DATABASES

ACROSS SESSIONS

Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.

1997 SESSION

  • print version
(HB2664)

AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES

    1. Page 1, engrossed, line 46, after found

      strike

        by a court

    2. Page 2, engrossed, line 9, after found

      strike

        by a court

    3. Page 2, engrossed, line 13, after found

      strike

        by a court

    4. Page 2, engrossed, line 16, after found

      strike

        by a court

    5. Page 2, engrossed, line 18, after found

      strike

        by a court

    6. Page 2, engrossed, line 22, after found

      strike

        by a court

    7. Page 2, engrossed, line 28, after D.

      strike

        Subsections B and C of this section shall not apply to any locality which

    8. Page 2, engrossed, line 29, after 1993

      strike

        remainder of line 29 and all of line 30

      insert

        Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision C1, any ordinance enacted pursuant to this section may provide that an animal warden may determine, after investigation, whether a dog is a dangerous dog. If the animal warden determines that a dog is a dangerous dog, he may order the animal's owner to comply with the provisions of the ordinance. If the animal's owner disagrees with the animal warden's determination, he may appeal the determination to the general district court.