SEARCH SITE
VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL
- Code of Virginia
- Virginia Administrative Code
- Constitution of Virginia
- Charters
- Authorities
- Compacts
- Uncodified Acts
- RIS Users (account required)
SEARCHABLE DATABASES
- Bills & Resolutions
session legislation - Bill Summaries
session summaries - Reports to the General Assembly
House and Senate documents - Legislative Liaisons
State agency contacts
ACROSS SESSIONS
- Subject Index: Since 1995
- Bills & Resolutions: Since 1994
- Summaries: Since 1994
Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.
2016 SESSION
(SB543)GOVERNOR'S VETO
Pursuant to Article V, Section 6, of the Constitution of Virginia, I veto Senate Bill 543, which requires an award of attorneys’ fees and other costs when a plaintiff wins or settles an inverse condemnation suit for “damaging” property, even when such damage is de minimis.
Money damages are already authorized for both takings of and damage to private property by government actions, through suits for inverse condemnation. In the event of a permanent taking by a governmental entity, a plaintiff is entitled to his or her attorneys’ fees and costs. Senate Bill 543 would extend the award of those fees and costs to suits in which a landowner’s property was not completely taken but only impaired, even if that impairment is nominal.
I am not opposed to the award of attorneys’ fees and costs in damages cases, within reason. As Governor, I am responsible for the fiscal health of Virginia, and I take my obligations as steward of taxpayers’ money seriously. Accordingly, I proposed an amendment to Senate Bill 543 seeking to cap attorneys’ fees and costs in damages cases to two hundred percent of the monetary award for the damage itself. This would have eliminated the incentive for nuisance lawsuits by unscrupulous attorneys seeking to enrich themselves at taxpayers’ expense in those cases where any actual damage was de minimis. The General Assembly elected to return Senate Bill 543 to me in its original form. Without some safeguard against unlimited exposure of taxpayer funds to litigation costs for nuisance suits, I cannot support this legislation.
Accordingly, I veto this bill.
GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATION
1. Line 17, enrolled, after proceeding.
insert
In no case shall such costs, disbursements, or expenses be awarded or reimbursed when the plaintiff claims a damaging of property and the awarded or settled compensation amount is less than 50 percent of the costs actually incurred because of such proceeding.