SEARCH SITE
VIRGINIA LAW PORTAL
- Code of Virginia
- Virginia Administrative Code
- Constitution of Virginia
- Charters
- Authorities
- Compacts
- Uncodified Acts
- RIS Users (account required)
SEARCHABLE DATABASES
- Bills & Resolutions
session legislation - Bill Summaries
session summaries - Reports to the General Assembly
House and Senate documents - Legislative Liaisons
State agency contacts
ACROSS SESSIONS
- Subject Index: Since 1995
- Bills & Resolutions: Since 1994
- Summaries: Since 1994
Developed and maintained by the Division of Legislative Automated Systems.
2007 SESSION
HB 3086 Driving under influence of alcohol; admissibility of breath test certificate.
Introduced by: Stephen C. Shannon | all patrons ... notes | add to my profiles
SUMMARY AS INTRODUCED:
Admissibility of DUI breath test certificate. Provides that any individual conducting a DUI breath test shall issue a certificate that will indicate the name of the accused, the date and time the sample was taken from the accused, the sample's alcohol content, and the name of the person who examined the sample. No attestation is required, and the certificate comes into evidence. Currently, the certificate also contains the assertions that (i) the test was conducted in accordance with the Department's specifications, (ii) the equipment on which the breath test was conducted had been tested within the previous six months and found to be accurate, and (iii) prior to the administration of the test, the accused was advised of his right to observe the process and see the blood alcohol reading on the equipment used to perform the breath test. Currently, the certificate must contain an attestation by the person who ran the test.
The bill also provides that the accused in a DUI case may challenge the admissibility of the breath test certificate through proof that (i) the test was not conducted in accordance with the Department's specifications, (ii) the equipment on which the breath test was conducted had not been tested within the previous six months and found to be accurate, or (iii) prior to the administration of the test, the accused was not advised of his right to observe the process and see the blood alcohol reading on the equipment used to perform the breath test.
FULL TEXT
HISTORY
- 01/17/07 House: Presented and ordered printed 077023502
- 01/17/07 House: Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
- 01/25/07 House: Assigned Courts sub: Criminal Law
- 02/06/07 House: Left in Courts of Justice